15 May Aspetti grammaticale addirittura dell’ideologia senecana, Testi ancora manuali per l’insegnamento universitario del latino 68, Bologna: Patron 2000
Per. Setaioli, “Interpretazioni stoiche addirittura epicuree in Servio di nuovo la preparazione dell’esegesi filosofica del leggenda anche dei poeti a Roma (Cornuto, Seneca, Filodemo)”, I–II,International Journal of the Classical Tradition 10, 2003–2004, 335–376; 11, 2004–2005, 3–46.
Verso. Setaioli, “Le fragment II Soubiran duDe consulatu de Ciceron, leDe diuinatione et leur lecture par Virgile”, in:Signe et prediction dans l’Antiquite. Actes du Tete-a-tete international interdisciplinaire de Creteil et de Paris (22–23–24 niente affatto 2003). Textes reunis par Jose Kany-Turpin, Saint-Etienne: Publications de l’Universite de Saint-Etienne 2005, 241–261.
Ancora. Merli, “Epigrammzyklen und ‘serielle Lekture’ sopra den Buchern Martials: Uberlegungen und Beispiele,” per F
W. H. Stahl,Macrobius’ Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies 48, New York: Columbia University Press 1952 (reprint: ibid. W. H. Stahl,Macrobius’ Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies 48, New York: Columbia University Press 1990).
P. Steinmetz, “Allegorische Deutung und allegorische Dichtung sopra der alten Stoa”,Rheinisches Museum fur Philologie N.F. 129, 1986, 18–30 (ristampato mediante: Pure, P. Steinmetz,Kleine Schriften, addirittura. Severin Koster, Palingenesia 68, Stuttgart: Steiner 2000).
References
The ‘conferenceacta’ comprise seven papers that are meant esatto document the direction(s) con which the exploration of Roman literature is now moving, or (more accurately perhaps) in the opinion of most of the contributorsshould orshould not be moving; they were published mediante the most recent volume of theTransactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 1–162 (for Edmunds, see 1–13).
Edmunds (above, n. 2):Transactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 8–9 (quotation at 8, the emphasis is mine); I leave it up puro the reader esatto discover which of the papers is excluded here. Note that Edmunds’ (and, of course, others’) elite notion of ‘interpretation’ is emphatically narrow and must not be put on per par with its ‘traditional’ sense, “sicuro expound the meaning of [something]; sicuro render (words, writings, an author, etc.) clear and explicit; esatto elucidate; sicuro explain” (OED 2 , s.v., 1a).
Exceptions prove the rule. Whatever W.’s predisposition may have been, he surely made verso wise decision when embarking onRoman Homosexuality for his Ph.D. first, andthen turning onesto a commentary on per collection of poetry.
For per theoretic back-up, cf. D. Fowler, “Criticism as commentary and commentary as criticism sopra the age of the electronic mezzi di comunicazione,” in: G. W. Most (ancora.),Commentaries-Kommentare, Aporemata 4 (Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1999): 426–442 (esp. 429–430).
Other examples of modern scholars, all well-known and highly esteemed forboth their theoryoriented works and their commentaries, include Addirittura. Fantham (Seneca, Lucan, Ovid), D. Fowler (Lucretius), and R. F. Thomas (Virgil), to name but verso few.
W., at 283–284, gives a list of the most important editions and commentaries, preciso which one might want esatto add Per. Canobbio,La lex Roscia theatralis addirittura Marziale: il cadenza del lettura V, Biblioteca di Athenaeum 49 (Como: New Press, 2002), because it is verso valuable supplement to P. Howell’s edition of Book 5 (Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1995), for which seeAnzeiger fur die Altertums-wissenschafter 50 (1997): 17–21. The collection of essays on Book 10, edited by G. Damschen and A. Heil,maton liber decimus: Text Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late onesto be included in W.’s bibliography.
The bibliography, as emphasized by W. (283), is of course not meant puro be exhaustive; for aForschungsbericht, see S. Lorenz, “]): 167–227, and cf. the bibliography con Damschen-Heil (above, n.7):maton liber decimus: Text, Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late puro be included sopra W.’s bibliography 401–490.
Come eliminare l’account her dating
For a useful assessment of this issue (initiated by K. Barwick), cf. Grewing (e.),Toto notus per orbe: Perspektiven der Martial-Interpretation, Palingenesia 65, (Stuttgart: F. Steiner Verlag, 1998): 139–156.
No Comments