Good. The relationship between recombination frequency and genetic length from inside the eukaryotes

13 May Good. The relationship between recombination frequency and genetic length from inside the eukaryotes

Elizabeth. (1952)

Jevons, Yards. P., and Parker, M. T. (1964). J. din. Street., 17, 243-250. Lidwell, 0. Meters. (1959). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 18,49-52. Alive, I., and you will Nichols, A good. C. (1961).J. inject. Dis.,108, 195-204. Macdonald, A great. (1946). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 5, 230-233. Meyer, W. (1966). Zentbl. Bukt. PurusitKde., We . Abt. Orig., 201,465-481. Meyer, W. (1967). J. Hyg., Camb., 65,439-447. Nakagawa, Meters. (1960). Jap. J. damp. Res., 8, 331-342. Oeding, P., and you can Williams, Roentgen. E. 0. (1958). 3. Hyg., Cumb., 56, 445-454. Pagano, J. S., Farrer, S. Yards., Plotkin, S. Good., Brachman, P. S., Fekety, F. R., and you will Pidcoe, V. (1960). Research, N.Y., 131, 927-928. Parker, Meters. T. (1966). When you look at the “The latest Scientific Foundation from Drug Yearly Opinion” (J. P. Ross, ed.), pp. 157-173. College out-of London, The newest Athlone mejores aplicaciones de citas travesti Push, London. Parker, Yards. T., Todinson, An excellent. J. H., and you will Williams, R. E. 0. (1955). J. Hyg., Cumb., 53,458-473.

The brand new parasexual years and its use in genetic investigation

Pether, J. V. S. (1968).J. Hyg., C an effective d . , 66,605. Poole, P. Meters., and you may Baker, J. R. (1966). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., twenty five, 116-123. Declaration (1959). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl.,nine, 115-118. Statement (1963). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl., thirteen, 119-122. Statement (1967). Int. Bull. buct. Nomencl., 17, 113-125. Report (1971). Int. Bull. syst. Buct., 21, 165, 167, 171. Rountree, P. Yards. (1959). J. gen. Microbiol., 20,620-633. Rountree, P. M., and Asheshov, Age. H. (1961). J. gen. Microbiol., twenty-six, 111-122. Rountree, P. M., and Freeman, B. M. (1955). Med. J. Aust., 2, 157-161. Ruys, An effective. C., and you can Borst, J. (1959). Antonie wan Leeuwenhoek, 25, 237-240. Seto, J. T., and you can Wilson, J. B. (1958). Are.step 3. wet. Res., 19, 241-246. Smith, H. W. (1948a).J. Hyg., C you d . , 46,7681. Smith, H. W. (1948b);Jp. Roadway. Ther., 58, 179-188. Smith, H. W. (1954).J. Path. Buc

Tarr, H. A great. (1958). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 17, 64-72. Watson, W. Good. (1965). Veterinarian. Rec., 77, 477-480. Wentworth, B., Romig, W. Roentgen., and you may Dixon, W. J. (1964). J. contaminate. Dis.,114, 179188.

Williams, Roentgen. Elizabeth. 0. (1957). Zentbl. Bakt. PurasitKde., I . Abt. Orig., 168, 528-532. Williams, R. Elizabeth. O., and Jevons, M. P. (1961). Zentbl. Bukt. ParasitKde., I Abt. Orig., 181,349-358. Williams, Roentgen. Elizabeth. O., and Rippon, J. J. Hyg., Camb., fifty, 320-353. Williams, R. Elizabeth. O., Rippon, J. Elizabeth., and Dowsett, L. M. (1953). Lancet, we, 510-514. Wilson, Grams. S., and you may Atkinson, J. D. (1945). Lancet, i, 647-649.

Hereditary Studies in the Small-organisms DAVID An excellent. HOPWOOD John Znnes Institute, Norwikh, England We. Inclusion . 11. Segregation as Proof of Easy Hereditary Manage . Good. The new genetic method to biology . B. This new recognition from segregation . 111. The cornerstone from Hereditary Mapping . B. The fresh new sequencing of loci on an excellent linkage map: multi-grounds crosses C. Linkagegroups . D. Genetic great-structure . E. Removal mapping . IV. Practical Hereditary Screening . A. Dominance screening . Bplementation tests . C. Epistasis . V. Hereditary Investigation within the Eukaryotic Microorganisms . Good. General considerations . step one. 2. Tetrad studies . B. Hereditary research particularly organisms 1. Aspergillus nidulans . . 2. Aspergillus niger and other “imperfect” fungi step three. Neurospora crassa . cuatro. Most other ascomycetes . 5. Yeasts . 6. Filamentous basidiomycetes . 7. Ustilago . 8. Chlamydomonas reinhardii . 9. Ciliates . ten. Slime moulds VI. Genetic Study in Prokaryotes . A good. Standard considerations . step one. Fertility items and conjugational mapping . dos. Transduction and you may co-transduction . step three. Sales and you will co-conversion 4. Non-selective study .

fifty 51 57 61 61 65 66 69 69 73 75 77 78 80 81 81 83 84 91 94

Genetic data particularly organisms step one. Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium or any other Enteric germs . 2. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Ps. putida . step three. Bacillus subtilis 4. Streptmyces coelicolor and other actinomycetes . 5. Almost every other micro-organisms C. Official mapping measures separate of recombination VII. Hereditary Analysis for the Viruses Good. General factors . 1. Form of viral genomes 2. Features of virus family genes B. Genetic investigation particularly viruses step one. Bacteriophages 2. Creature viruses step three. Bush worms VIII. Concluding Remarks Records .